It is strange what does and does not pick up steam on social media sometimes. When late last week I flagged the Astead Herndon article in the New York Times updating the Democratic efforts to finalize rules for the 2020 presidential nomination process, I was doing so more for personal reasons. As I explained in the remainder of the thread , I was more interested in bookmarking the article because there were several notes in it that deserved some attention if not pushback. The window of attention was much more immediate for FHQ, then, than it was seemingly taken by most. Again, whereas I meant to relatively soon get back to what I see as the flaws of the NYT piece, most took it as FHQ flagging the proposed rule change -- specifically the scaling back of superdelegates -- for a time, far down the road, when the unintended consequences of the change will potentially be felt. But the thing is, that overall story has not changed -- the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee continues to conside...
Comments
Post a Comment